Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MINT is cca enforcable?


r&b
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all. Attached are the various documents sent in reply to a cca request on 29/12/08. Can anyone tell me if this is enforcable as I already have a ccj against me with this (before I knew abt cca issues) and they are now (court date 24th Feb) attempting to get a charging order on my property (there are 2 already). If its enforcable obviously I cant do much if not how do I go about defending the charging order (is this even possible)? Many thanks for any help.

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply.jpg

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply2.jpg

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply3.jpg

RBS.ADVANTA.GREEN&CO cca reply4.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

try this

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply-1.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply2.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply4.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

src="http://i615.photobucket.com/albums/tt231/robntanya/RBSADVANTAGREENCOccareply3.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket">

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks supasnooper... can i go for a set aside at the charging order hearing or is that diff matter altogether and if so do i simply defend the charging order? indeed can i defend the charging order on these grounds? also i note your points but how would i defend it in legalese to a judge such that he/she will find in my favour? appreciate the help..

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for the delay in getting back to you, I didn't spot this earlier.

 

May I ask, did you admit the debt when you were issued with the CCJ papers ?

 

It may be a bit tricky to apply for a set aside if you did.

 

However, moving on.

You'll need to apply for a set aside seperately to the Charging Order.

 

If you make the application immediately , you may get the Set Aside hearing and Charging Order hearings combined............perhaps, but if you don't try, the answer's already a no.

 

A set aside will cost £75 and needs to be done on a form N244.

 

The reasons for a set aside - you didn't know your rights at the time, no information supplied by the claimant with the N1 form, unenforceable CCA and you found CAG (Don't put down the last one) !

 

Don't get too stressed out about the legalise, you are a Litigant In Person, and as such, a judge should allow you certain latitude in your approach to this.

 

 

Moving on, to set aside a CCJ have a look at this thread from post #66 -

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/168328-some-advice-re-interim-4.html

 

 

I've attached a form N244 below.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

supasnooper ur a star many thanks..yes i did admit it under advice from CCCS ..i presume this will be brought up by the judge ... does the law take precedence over any admission on my part?

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately letting CCCS handle this has got you the CCJ. Although they can be helpful, they really work for the creditors.

 

You will have to state to the judge that you were ill-advised by CCCS, and looking into the matter further, you found better advice from another source and would wish to set aside the CCJ as you are now fully aware of your legal rights.

 

Get the application to set aside the CCJ done and submitted as soon as possible or a judge may not consider the application. It will cost £75 to make the application.

 

Have a search for form EX160 if you think you maybe exempt from court fees.

 

Good Luck.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks supa...i ll get the forms sorted soon as...i wont be exempt...any advice was welcome at the time, shame i didnt find this site first. you live n learn i guess. going back to the reasons for the set aside,could you just expand on the reasoning i would use. you stated the TnC s and the link with 2006 charges, which i didnt quite get..also i guess i need to get this to my local court, will i need to send a letter explaining my intended actions or simply phone the court to get it moved and then get the forms in to my local ?...many thanks

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

any ideas as to the action to get the case moved ? phone call or letter of explanation and do i conatct GREEN & CO to let them know as well? should i send them a SAR or any other letters to help my case in teh future? many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok letter to get the case moved to my local court will go monday...then as soon as i get confirmation through I will put the N244 in to my local court....does the main form p.2 of the copies with the signature on it, not seem to be an application form? am i right in thinking therefore that this is not an agreement at all? should I send any request, as in SAR to Green & Co or anyone else to see what they might have?

many thanks

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, firstly get an appeal together for the Interim Charging Order, use the points raised here National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 15 Charging Orders In The County Court

 

This needs to be signed and received by the court by Tuesday (and copy to Greens, don't send them anything else and do NOT sign this copy).

 

Also get your request off to get this moved to your local court as you've stated as you are a Litigant In Person.

 

Nest, If you wish to apply for a set aside then complete the n244 and get it into the court ASAP, do NOT wait for any correspondence or anything else !

If you are lucky, the courts may tie the set aside and the Interim Charging Order hearings together.

 

A subject Access request to RBS\Mint would be useful as it will or should disclose what documentation they hold i.e CCA and Default Notice.

 

Also it will provide details of any penalty charges you may want to reclaim if you don't get the CCJ set aside.

 

 

My reference to 2006 refers to when the default charges were reduced to £12.00 as stated on the T&C's they have sent. These T&C's were not relevant in 2001 /2002 when you first got the credit card.

 

As you have spotted, p2 of the bumpf they've provided you with may meet s78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 but does not meet with s61 as there is no interest rate shown, no repayment details present and no reference to a credit limit.

 

Have a read of these threads to understand CCA's (courtesy of 42man & steven4064 respectively ) -

 

Is My Agreement Enforceable - Useful

 

Consumer Credit Agreements

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks supa......

sorry if im gonna drive u mad here but want to get this rite..

 

"Ok, firstly get an appeal together for the Interim Charging Order, use the points raised here National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 15 Charging Orders In The County Court

 

This needs to be signed and received by the court by Tuesday (and copy to Greens, don't send them anything else and do NOT sign this copy)."

 

what do u mean by get together an appeal, in what format? do i treat the charging order as a separate issue for court purposes i.e can i use the argument that my house now does not have enough equity to cover any charging orders, that i have several other debtors,etc (although 3 charging orders in total already, further reducing any equity available) or do i have to formulate something that i can use later on? are there any forms that need to go in (and to greens) or am i simply getting together a defense?

 

"Also get your request off to get this moved to your local court as you've stated as you are a Litigant In Person.

 

Nest, If you wish to apply for a set aside then complete the n244 and get it into the court ASAP, do NOT wait for any correspondence or anything else !"

 

do i send all this to my local court with a covering letter perhaps explaining the movement request or to the original CC for them to send on?

 

"My reference to 2006 refers to when the default charges were reduced to £12.00 as stated on the T&C's they have sent. These T&C's were not relevant in 2001 /2002 when you first got the credit card."

 

gotcha...makes sense when u know wot ur talking about...cant wait for that bit myself seems long way off at the mom....lol

 

really appreciate your help here

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR going tomorrow gteed del to RBS head office. any ideas on my above points as i d like to get this done today and sent tomorrow to beat the tuesday deadline (is this to comply with court timing)?

 

thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

should the appeal be in the form of a letter setting out the issues with the original CCJ and CCA or should i submit a court form of some description?

Link to post
Share on other sites

trying to sort out the N244 as well any help here especially with parts 3 and 10 would be appreciated....still unsure about the appeal mentioned in no.14 by SUPA....need to get this done if its to be with them tom....

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok for the N244:

self explanatory up to part 3 for which i have put:

"set aside on the grounds of poor initial advice, not knowing my rights at the time, no information supplied by the claimant with the N1 form and an unenforceable consumer credit agreement."

thanks for the help previously Supa and if you re looking in what was the N1 form on which im relying in this part?

i ve looked through but found no relevent substitutions i could use for part 10 of the form for the evidence. clearly i ve got what they sent me as a CCA but what else do i need here ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

.... sorry guys need advice on this appeal of charging order any help pls...

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

any help there pls....im constructing smth myself but help wud be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok this is wot im sending to telford and greens by gteed del...

 

claim no xxxxx

dear sir,

i write regarding the interim charging order under the above claim number to be held on 24th Feb 2009.

As a litigant in person I am writing to appeal against this order on two counts: firstly that with the recent collapse in house prices, it is very doubtful indeed that there will be any further equity should the house be sold, once the two mortgages are paid, notwithstanding two further charging orders. Secondly, I intend to pursue a set aside of the original CCJ, to which this charging order pertains.

I trust these reasons are sufficient to grant my request.

 

 

any thoughts though this is goin soon.....

also any ideas with regard to the N244 queries above as I need to get that in too...

many thanks

Edited by r&b
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

rite sent that letter gteed next day, signed for, etc, etc to telford cc and green & co...hope that covers whats reqd..... as well as SAR to RBS...

thanks martin for the reply.... is STAT DEMAND about bankruptcy or have i read that wrong? ive not had one of those but have a current CCJ that i want to set aside and a CHARGING ORDER hearing on 24th feb which is wot that letter of appeal was about....can i use those arguments for the CCJ set aside?could still do with specific help on filling in the N244 for the set aside if poss....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...